SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(All) 217

RAGHUBAR DAYAL, AGARWALA
MOOL CHAND – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.S.SARAN

AGARWALA, J.


( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by Mool Chand, aged 22 years, and Phool Chand, aged 30 years, against their conviction under Section 302 and under Sections 302/34, I. P. C. respectively and sentence of death. There is also before us the usual reference for the confirmation of the death sentence.

( 2 ) THE appellants were prosecuted along with Brij Lal and Ram Naresh under Sections 147, 148, 302 read with Section 149, I. P. C. for having conspired together to murder one Nathey Ahir after arming themselves with deadly weapons in the company of one or two more persons and for having committed murder of the aforesaid person at about mid-night between the 3rd and 4th august 1951 in village Bahapur, while the deceased was sleeping on a Machan in a field. Brij lal and Ram Naresh were acquitted by the learned Sessions Judge.

( 3 ) IT appears that Mool Chands father Lautan and Phool Chands father Sultan were cousins. They used to cultivate a field of Rampat zamindar, P. W. 13. Rampat ejected them by means of a suit and then cultivated the land himself for two years. In the month of Jeth or Baisakh 1951 nathey deceased got the land from Rampat. Mool Chand and Phool Chand did not like th




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top