SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(All) 192

AGARWALA, RAGHUBAR DAYAL
PREM SHANKAR PANDAYA – Appellant
Versus
U. P. PROVINCIAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amarnath Kaul, Gopinath Kunzru

RAGHUBAR DAYAL, J.

( 1 ) PREM Shankar Pandaya applies for the issue of directions, orders or writs in the nature of mandamus, prohibition or certiorari declaring that the order of allotment passed on 16-3-1950 in respect of house No. ck/36/7 situate in Chowk Banaras was invalid and illegal, and directing the opposite parties, viz. , the U. P. Provincial Co-operative Bank Ltd. and Shri Chunni Lal allottees and the Assistant Kent Control and Eviction Officer, Banaras, and the Rent Control? and eviction Officer, Banaras, not to take any steps or action on the basis of the allotment order,

( 2 ) THE facts leading to this application are that the applicant is the owner of the house in suit and had let it to the Bharat Bank Ltd. , of Delhi. He himself occupied another rented house. The house was let in 1943 under a lease for five years. The lease was renewed in 1948 and was to expire in january 1958. The applicant, however, persuaded the rentee, the Bharat Bank Ltd. of Delhi, to vacate the house in October 1950 as he wanted it for the purpose of his business. The Bharat bank vacated the house on 31-104950.

( 3 ) ON 15-11-1950 the applicant sent a notice to the Rent Control and Eviction Of
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top