SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(All) 320

AGARWALA
GIRJA PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
ZALIM SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.B.MISHRA, R.B.Mishra

AGARWALA, J.


( 1 ) THE complaint against the applicants which was presented before the Panchayati Adalat of bhagwatipur was that the applicants had cut away a tree belonging to the complainant and standing in his land and that when the complainant remonstrated with the applicants he was assaulted with lathis by them. The tree was claimed by the applicants to belong to them. The pancbayati Adalat went into the matter and found that the tree belonged to the complainant and that the applicants were not justified in cutting it. Each of the applicants were, therefore, convicted and sentenced to a fine of Rs. 25. The applicants went up in revision to the sub-Divisional Magistrate. The revision was dismissed.

( 2 ) IN this application before me it has been urged that the constitution of the Panchayati Adalat which tried the case was not in accordance with the provisions of Section 49 of the U. P. Panchayat Raj Act inasmuch as only one panch out of the five panches was taken from the village in which the complainant and the accused lived. It is urged that both parties live in the same village and since Section 49 requires that one panch from the village in which the complainant lives and a











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top