SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(All) 291

B.M.LAL
MAKHAN LAL JAIN – Appellant
Versus
AMRIT BANASPATI CO. LTD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.SANYAL, B.L.Gupta, BHAGWAN DAS, C.K.DAPHTARY, HARI SVARUP, J.Swarup, S.N.Verma, SATYENDRANATH VARMA

BRIJ MOHAN LALL, J.


( 1 ) THIS is an application under Sections 153c and 153d recently inserted in the Companies Act (7 of 1913) by the amending Act (52 of 1951 ). The petitioners are two share-holders in the Amrit banaspati Company Limited, Ghaziabad, here-after described, for brevitys sake, as the company. They have made various allegations of mismanagement and foul play against the company, its Directors and Managing Agents. But it is unnecessary to go into those allegations at this stage because a preliminary objection has been taken by the learned counsel for the opposite parties and the petition fails, in my opinion, on that preliminary ground alone.

( 2 ) IT is contended on behalf of the opposite parties that the requirements of Sub-section (3) of section 153c have not been complied with. The relevant portion of this sub-section reads as follows :

" (3) No application under Sub-section (1) shall be made by any member, unless- (a) in the case of a company having a share capital, the member complaining- (i) has obtained the consent in writing of not less than one hundred in number of the members of the company or not less than one-tenth in number of the members, whichever is le















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top