BIND BASNI PRASAD, MUSHTAQ AHMAD
KIRPASHANKER SHASTRI – Appellant
Versus
L. BANWARI LAL – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is a defendantss appeal in a suit for ejectment from a house and for recovery of Rs. 24-4-6 as arrears of rent for and certain period prior to 4-12-1945. There was also a prayer for mesne profits.
( 2 ) THE plaintiffs case was that the defendant had been his tenant on a monthly rent of Rs. 6. 4 6 the tenancy beginning from the 5th of each month. Prior to the suit the plaintiff had, on 25-10-1943, obtained the permission of the Controller to sue for the defendants ejectment) under section 14, Meerut House Control Order 1945. He had given a notice to the defendant, terminating the tenancy on 4-12-1945, before he filed the suit.
( 3 ) THE defence taken was that the plaintiff was not entitled to sue without joining the other co sharer, his own brother, that the rent had been paid up to 5-9-1945, that the rent for the subsequent period bad been sent by money order to the plaintiff who had refused it, the defendant being, therefore, entitled to a set off for Rs. 2-14 0 as money order charges and that the permission obtained by the plaintiff having been given in the defendants absence was invalid.
( 4 ) THE trial Court, rejecting this defence, decreed the suit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.