SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(All) 96

P.L.BHARGAVA
BABULAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.G.CHATTERJI

P. L. BHARGAVA, J.


( 1 ) THIS application in revision has been filed by Babu Lal and Madhusudan, who were charged and tried for an offence punishable under Section 435, Penal code, by a Magistrate of the first class of Mohamdi, in Kheri district. The learned Magistrate found them guilty, convicted them of the offence with which they were charged and sentenced each of them to rigorous imprisonment for one year and to a fine of Rs. 100.

( 2 ) THE case for the prosecution was as follows: On the night between 17th and 18th March 1950, at about 10 p. m. , the applicant Madbusudan went to Dal chand alias Dalla a tongawala, and asked him to get ready his tonga as he had babulal and Anr. vs. State (21. 05. 1951 -ALLHC) Page 2 of 5 (21. 05. 1951 -ALLHC) Page 2 of 5 to go somewhere. Dalla refused saying that his horse was tired and he himself was unwell. This is said to have annoyed Madhusudan, who threatened Dalla to see him and break his limbs. Dalla and his wife, Shanti, went to sleep in their house. Dallas horse was, as usual, tethered in a double-thatched shed (bangla) near his house. About a couple of hours later Dalchand and his wife heard the noise of their horse jumping in the head.













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top