SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(All) 142

DESAI
PANNA LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.P.KUMAR

DESAI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a reference by the Additional Sessions Judge of Aligarh recommending that an order passed by a Magistrate of the First Class be set aside and he be directed to try the case de novo.

( 2 ) THE case was under Sections 323 and 506 triable by a Second Class Magistrate. A Bench of magistrates, invested with Second Class Powers, took cognisance of the offence and recorded some evidence and also framed a charge against the applicants. Subsequently the Bench of magistrates thought that the case was triable by a First Class Magistrate and stayed proceedings and referred the case to the City Magistrate. The City Magistrate transferred the case to the Court of the First Class Magistrate whose order is in question. When the applicants appeared before the first Class Magistrate, they prayed that the trial should be de novo and that the witnesses should be recalled. The learned Magistrate rejected the application, stating that the applicants did not explain why they wanted a de novo trial. That is the order sought to be revised by this reference.

( 3 ) THE case was undoubtedly transferred under Section 346, Criminal P. C. , by the Bench of magistrates to the First Class M






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top