SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(All) 201

DESAI
PURSHOTTAM DAS BANARSIDAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE THROUGH HARSHAD RAI NATWARLAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.S.PATHAK, KRISHNA AGRAWAL, P.C.Chaturvedi

DESAI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a reference by the Additional District Magistrate, Kanpur recommending that an order passed by the Special Railway Magistrate, First Class, Kanpur purporting to act under Section 523, Criminal P. C. be set aside. The learned Additional District Magistrate, who I must say, has written a well-reasoned and sound order has not recommended that another order be passed instead, but his intention does seem to be that another order be passed by this Court.

( 2 ) THERE is no dispute about the facts which are as follows:

( 3 ) MESSRS. Harshad Eai Natvar Lal who are opposite party before me, consigned 240 bags of white zira from Unjha railway station to self at Kanpur. The railway receipt was sent by them to the Bank of Baroda at Kanpur with instructions to deliver it to Messrs. Baldeo Das Sita Ram of kanpur on their paying RS. 30,000, the price of the goods. Messrs. Baldeo Das Sita Ram took time in finding the necessary money and in the meantime some one, who remains unknown and untraced, forged a railway receipt and on its strength took delivery of the goods from the railway at Kanpur. The forger then pawned the goods with Messrs Parsbotam Das Benarsi Das of kanpur, t






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top