SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(All) 185

BEG, MALIK
SIDDIQ AHMAD – Appellant
Versus
WILAYAT AHMAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Hakimuddin, Mohd.Ayub, NAIM ULLAH

MALIK, CJ.


( 1 ) ONE Hakim Ali was the owner of two annas eight pies share out of sixteen annas in village kasmandi Kalan, Pargana and Tehsil Malihabad, in the district of Lucknow. He had four sons wajid Ali, Faqir Mohammad, Nazar Mohammad and Saiyid Ahmad. Wajid Ali died in his fathers lifetime. He left a son Wahid Ali, alias Kallan. Under the Mahomedan Law Wahid Ali, his father having predeceased Hakim Ali, was not an heir of Hakim Ali. Hakim Ali on 17th May 1903, executed a will in favour of his three surviving sons Faqir Mohammad, Nazar Mohammad and Saiyid Ahmad and his grandson, Wahid Ali. It is the interpretation of this will with which we are mainly concerned.

( 2 ) HAKIM Ali died on 18th September 1909. His three sons and his grandson Wahid Ali alias kalian survived him. The property, that is, the two annas and eight pies share, was mutated in the name of his three sons and his grandson Wahid Ali on the basis of inheritance. On 11th April 1928, Wahid Ali gifted his entire share which was eight pies in the village aforementioned, to kulaumunnissa, wife of Faqir Mohammad, that is, to his aunt. She got mutation in her favour and in 1937 the property waa partitioned through th
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top