SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(All) 173

AGARWALA
DEB RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE THROUGH THE RANGE OFFICER, DEOGHAR RANGE FOREST – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
CHATURBHUJ SAHAI, H.P.GUPTA

AGARWALA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a reference made by the District Magistrate of Dehra Dun.

( 2 ) THE applicant Deb Ram was prosecuted by the Forest Department under Section 26 (1) (a) and (h), Forest Act, on the ground that he was found cultivating land situate in Majog Compartment no. 7 which, by a notification dated 9-12-1924, had been declared a Government reserved forest. The defence was that the land had been in possession of the applicant and his forefathers for a very long time and had been continuously cultivated by them and that, therefore, no offence was committed by the applicant in continuing to cultivate the land. The accused was tried summarily by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Chakrata. The learned Magistrate did not reject the defence case that the land had been for a long time under his cultivation. But it was observed that even if the accuseds conteation, viz. , that the land had been with his family for several decades be accepted, the rights of the tenants were extinguished by the issue of the notification aforesaid and thereafter the possession of tha accused became illegal. The applicant was, therefore, convicted under Section 26 (1) (a) and (b), Forest Act, and sen









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top