SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(All) 239

MISRA
PAMBHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
KESRI BIR PRASAD

MISRA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a revision under Article 227 of the Constitution and alternatively under Section 561a, criminal P. 0. against an order of the Panchayti Adalat, Kunda, district Partabgarh. The applicant pambhi has been convicted of offences under Sections 323 and 504, Penal Code and sentenced to pay a fine of Es. 35 in respect of the first charge and Rs. 20 in respect of the second, it being provided that if the fine was realized, Rs. 15 thereof would be given to the complainant as compensation. Pambhis revision under Section 85, Panchayat Raj Act to the Court of the Sub divisional Magistrate, Kunda, failed and he now invokes the aid of this Court under the provisions referred to above.

( 2 ) SECTION 85, Panchayat Raj Act, confers the power of revision on Sub-Divisional Magistrates and Munsifs over the orders or decrees of the Panchayati Adalat and provides that decrees or orders passed by the Panchayati Adalat in any suit case or proceeding under the Act "shall be final and shall not be open to appeal or revision in any Court. " Article 227 of the Constitution which is called in aid on behalf of the applicant confers upon every High Court the powers of superintendence over











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top