SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(All) 255

WALI ULLAH, P.L.BHARGAVA
RAM KUMAR RAM CHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
THE DOMINION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.K.AGARWAL, T.N.Bajpai

P. L. BHARGAVA, J.


( 1 ) THIS is an application in revision, under Section 25, Provincial Small Cause Courts Act. The applicant had instituted a suit, in the Court of the Judge, Small Cause Court, Kanpur, against the dominion of India for recovery of damages resulting from the shortage and non-delivery of two bags of ginger, which were made over to the Administration of the G. I. P. Railway for transmission from Wadi Bunder to Kanpur. In the title of the suit in the plaint the applicant had described himself thus : "messrs. Ram Kumar Ram Chandra through Ram Kumar Adult son of sarjoo Prasad caste Vaisb residing at Naya Ganj Kanpur, partner of the firm". In para. 1 of the plaint the applicant had stated that the plaintiffs are a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act and Lala ram Kumar who has signed and verified the plaint, is registered partner of the firm. "

( 2 ) ON behalf of the defendant the allegation in para. 1 of the plaint was denied and the liability for payment of any damages was also disputed. One of the issues framed in the suit was : "are plaintiffs entitled to sue?" The applicant attempted to prove by oral evidence that Ram Kumar was a partner in














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top