JAGDISH SAHAI, R. S. PATHAK
Sidh Gopal Gajanand – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed by M/s. Sidh Gopal Gajanand, described as an "alleged association of persons" and by Budhoolal Mehrotra and Sidh Gopal Kapur.
2. The petitioners say that M/s. Sidh Gopal Gajanand was a partnership firm, constituted under an instrument of partnership dated April 1, 1948, with its head office at Bombay and a brunch business at Kanpur styled as M/s. Ganga Textiles. The partnership firm is said to have consisted of 19 members, two of whom are the petitioners, Budhoolal Mehrotra and Sidh Gopal Kapur. The petitioners allege that the firm carried on wholesale cloth business from March 13, 1948, to July 1, 1949, and was dissolved on the latter date. The firm was registered u/s 26A of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1922, for the assessment year 1949-50 and was assessed to Income Tax accordingly. For the assessment year 1950-51, however, it was assessed as an unregistered firm. The firm was assessed at Bombay.
3. On February 26, 1958, a notice u/s 34 was served upon the second and third petitioners as partners of the dissolved firm stating that the income of the firm for the assessment year 1949-50 had been under assesse
Madhya Pradesh Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Others (UOI)
Lalji Haridas Vs. Income Tax Officer and Another
Calcutta Discount Company Limited Vs. Income Tax Officer, Companies District, I and Another
PANNALAL BINJRAJ AND ANOTHER Vs. THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS. (AND OTHER CASES).
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.