SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(All) 176

MISRA
MOHD. ILYAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
NASIRULLAH BEG, S.C.Das

MISRA, J.


( 1 ) THE applicant, Mohammad Ilyas, was convicted by a first class Judicial Magistrate of partabgarh of an offence under Section 411, Penal Code, and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for nine months. The decision was affirmed by the Additional Civil and Sessions judge, Partabgarh, and the accused has coma up to this Court in revision. The case which the courts below have found against him is that he dishonestly retained six watches which were stolen on the night between 8th and 9th November 1949, from the shop of Abdul Raoof knowing or having reason to believe that they were stolen property.

( 2 ) THE report in respect of the theft was lodged by Abdul Raoof on 9th November 1949, at partabgarh Kotwali. The evidence indicated that on 16th November 1949, Vidyadhar, head constable, who was in charge of the Macandrew Ganj outpost was informed by the complainant that Muhammad Ilyas was trying to dispose of a watch at the house of a prostitute in Partabgarh at an inordinately low pries. He, therefore, proceeded to the house and took possession of the watch (EX. l) and though the accused protested that it belonged to him, he effected Ilyass arrest.

( 3 ) AS regards Ex.






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top