SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(All) 199

BIND BASNI PRASAD
ABDUL HAKIM – Appellant
Versus
JAN MOHAMMAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MUKHTAR AHMED, SRIPAT SAHAI SRIVASTAVA

BIND BASNI PRASAD, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal from the judgment and decree of the learned Civil Judge of Basti upholding the decree of the learned Munsif of Bansi by which he partially decreed a claim for preemption. The relevant facts are as follows:

( 2 ) ON 14-9-1944, Hari Prasad and Bhawa, defts. 10 and 11 sold certain Zamindari property to the defts. 1st party. There were originally seven vendees, one of them died during the pendency of the suit and his heirs, seven in number, were substituted in his place.

( 3 ) A perusal of the sale-deed shows that the sale of the vendees was in specified shares. Half of the property was sold to Abdul Hakin, minor,, deft. 7, who is applt. l in this Ct. , and the remaining half was told in equal shares to the rest of the vendees. The sale consideration was RS. 17,000. Some of the vendees were co-sharers with the vendors but some were strangers. On 1-11-1944,, the stranger vendees executed a deed of exchange in favour of the defts. second party and those vendees who were co-sharera from before the sale. The pltfs. assailed this exchange on the ground of fraud and also that it was void so far as Abdul Hakim, applt. I, was concerned as it was exe


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top