SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(All) 225

AGARWALA, P.L.BHARGAVA
DAU DAYAL – Appellant
Versus
BRIJ MOHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BALESHWARI PRASAD, Jagdish Sarup

AGARWALA, J.


( 1 ) THIS is a defendants appeal arising out of a suit for recovery of arrears of rent.

( 2 ) ON 27-9-1932, the defendant usufructuarily mortgaged a house to the plaintiffs respondents. On the same date the defendant executed a qabuliat whereby he promised to pay a sum of Rs. is per month as rent of the house to the mortgagees for a period of 5 years. No lease, as provided under Section 107, T P. Act, signed both by the lessor and the lessee, was executed. The qabuliat was, however, registered- Five years elapsed on 27-9-1937. The defendant did nob vacate the premises nor entered into a fresh agreement. The plaintiffs-respondents then served a notice upon the defendant-appellant to vacate the house. As the defendant did not vacate the house a suit for the ejectment of the defendant was filed on 29 1-1938. In this suit no claim for arrears of rent was included. Then while the ejectment suit was pending, on 19-4-1941 the suit which has given rise to the present appeal, was filed for recovery of rent for the period 27-8. 35 to 26-12-38.

( 3 ) THE defence to the suit was that it was barred by Order. 2 Rule 2 Civil P C. , and that the suit for rent for the period prior to












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top