SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(All) 226

MISRA
BADRUZZAMAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
KALBE MUSTAFA, M.H.Faruqi

MISRA, J.


( 1 ) THIS is a revision against the appellate decision of the learned Additional Sessions Judge of rae Bareli affirming the order of conviction passed against the applicant, Badruzzman Khan, by a Sub-divisional Magistrate in that district under Section 5 (l), Influx from Pakistan Control Act, 1949 (XXIII [23] of 1949 ). Badruzzaman was originally sentenced to undergo nine months rigorous imprisonment but the lower appellate Court reduced the sentence to one of fine amounting to Rs. 500/- or three months rigorous imprisonment in default of its payment.

( 2 ) SECTION 3, Influx from Pakistan Control Act, prohibits persons not exempted under the Rules framed in pursuance of Section 4 of the Act from entering India from. Pakistan directly or indirectly except under a permit, or valid passport in the case of persons not domiciled in India or Pakistan. Section 4 invests the Central Government with powers to make rules under the Act for prescribing the authorities by which and the conditions subject to which permits may be issued, renewed or extended, laying down the qualifications of persons entitled to them, regulating the movements of permit holders in India and providing for











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top