SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(All) 297

MALIK, V. BHARGAVA
MOHD. NAIM MOHD. ALAM – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.MUKHERJEE, WALTER DUTT

MALIK CJ.

( 1 ) THIS is a reference under Section 66 (1), Income-tax Act. The following two questions have been referred to us for our opinion:

"1. Whether by issue of a notice for hearing, of an appeal the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax is debarred from subsequently holding that the appeal is time-barred under section 30 (2), Income-tax Act? 2. Whither the refusal of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax to admit an appeal on the ground that it is time-barred is an order under Section 31, Income-tax Act and appealable to the Appellate Tribunal under Section 33, Income-tax Act?" from the facts set out below, it would appear that the second question does not really arise and, therefore, does not call for an answer.

( 2 ) THE notice of demand was served on the assessee on 10-1-1947. The assessee filed an application for a copy of the order of assessment. On 29-8-1947, he sent a reminder by registered post that he had not received the copy of the order till then. No reply was received from the income-tax Officer and on 20-11-1947, the assessee sent a second reminder by registered post. In reply to that reminder, he heard from the Income-tax Officer that the








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top