SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(All) 285

AGARWALA, P.L.BHARGAVA
ZAMIAR AHMED – Appellant
Versus
S. HAIDAR NAZAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Hamidullah Beg, Raizada Sumer Chand Jain

AGARWALA, J.


( 1 ) THIS is a defendants appeal arising out of a suit for pre-emption. The facts briefly stated are : there is a grove No. 1247 in Mahal Maufi Thok Mohammad Naqi in the town of Amroha. The parties are co-sharers in the Mahal. Defendants 2 to 6, namely, Syed Hasan, Munsif Hasan, Mt. Manzoor Fatma, Absan Hasan Khan and Mt. Fatma Sughra, sold their shares in the grove to zamir Abmad by means of a sale deed, dated 29-6-1942, for a consideration of Rs. 200. Haidar nazar filed a suit for pre-emption on the ground that he had, according to the custom of pre-emption prevailing with regard to the property in dispute a preferential right and was entitled to pre-empt the property sold. He claimed the preferential right on the ground that he was a relation of the vendors in addition to his being a co-sharer, while Zamir Ahmad, the vendee, was merely a co-sharer. The defence inter alia was that there was a custom of pre-emption in amroha, that, at any rate, if there was a custom it was in accordance with the Muham-madan law and that as the plaintiff had not performed the demands necessary under that law, he was not entitled to pre-empt the property. The trial Court held that ther

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top