CHANDIRAMANI
RAMDIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an application in revision against the appellate order of Shri Raja Ram Mehra, Civil and Sessions Judge of Sitapur.
( 2 ) IT appears that the applicants were prosecuted before a Special Magistrate, first class, Sitapur, under Sections. 427, 352 and 447, Penal Code, on the allegation that they had forcibly ploughed up certain fields belonging to the master of the complainant on 3-9-1949, at about 5 A. M. , thereby causing loss of Rs. 500 and that when the complainant protested the applicants chased him and he had to save himself by flight. The learned Magistrate did not find the charge under section 427, proved and acquitted the applicants, but he convicted them under Sections. 352 and 447, Penal Code, and fixed them. The applicants went up in revision to the learned Sessions judge and urged before him that in view of their convictions under Section 352 and 447, Penal code, the case was clearly one triable exclusively by the Panchayati Adalat under Sections 52 and 56, U. P. Panchayat Raj Act. The learned Sessions Judge thought that Section 56 was not applicable because it was only after hearing the arguments that the learned Magistrate found the offenc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.