SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 2147

ARUN TANDON
Anil Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared
For Petitioner: Ms. Bushra Maryiam
For Respondents: Abhinav Prasad and S.C.

Judgment

Per ARUN TANDON, J.

Heard learned counsel for the parties. Counsel for the parties agree that the writ petition may be finally disposed at this stage without calling for a counter affidavit specifically in view of the order proposed to be passed today.

2. Petitioner Anil Kumar Yadav made three applications under the provisions of Payment of Wages Act alleging therein that the employers Imperial Cinema have not made payment of wages for the period mentioned in the applications. The applications were numbered as PW A-1 of 1995, PW A-2/1995 and PW A-3/1995. The Prescribed Authority under the Act vide order dated July 15,2003 held that the applications made were liable to be allowed and, therefore, directed payment of withheld 2 wages along with interest thereon and penalty.

3. Against this order of the Prescribed Authority, the employers Imperial Cinema filed an appeal under Section 17 of the Payment of the Wages Act. The Additional District Judge, Moradabad Appellate Authority under the impugned order dated July 12, 2007 has allowed the appeal filed by the employers only after recording that the provisions of Payment of Wages Act are not applicable insofar as the Cinema Halls















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top