SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(All) 261

AMAR SARAN
Raj Kumari Awasthi – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Saurabh Srivastava, for Applicants, Shashi Dhar Tripathi, A. G. A. for Opp. Parties.

ORDER :- Heard Shri Saurabh Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicants and Shri Shashi Dhar Tripathi, learned Additional Government Advocate.

2. The applicants who are the wife and daughter of O.P. No. 2 have preferred this application under section 482 Cr. P. C. challenging the order dated 29-11 -2007 whereby the learned Additional Chief Family Court, Kanpur Nagar has modified his order dated 9-5-06 granting maintenance to both the applicants at the rate of Rs. 700 per month in proceedings under section 127 Cr. P.C in Case No. 171 of 2006 and limited the grant of maintenance to his daughter, applicant Akansha till the date she turns major, i.e. till 21-8-06 whilst upholding the grant of maintenance to his wife, applicant Smt. Raj Kumari Awasthi.

3. This part of the order was assailed by the applicants by arguing that under section 127 of the Code, grant of maintenance cannot be denied to an unmarried daughter, who has no source of income whatsoever to maintain herself and who being a student of Class-XII is in dire need of her fathers assistance for her education and upbringing.

4. My attention was however drawn to section 125(l)(c) of the Code, which reads as under :

125. Order














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top