A.K.ROOPANWAL
Bhahma Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
ORDER :- As all the above applicants under Section 482, Cr. P. C. arose out of the same set of facts and the common arguments have been advanced in these petitions, hence, these all are being decided by one common order.
2. The facts of the case are that a complaint was filed by O. P. No. 2, M/s. Surya Leasing Ltd. through its Special Power of Attorney Shri Pradeep Kumar Agarwal against nine persons namely M/s. Garima Construction Co. (P) Ltd. through its Managing Director, Shri Kapil Krishan Sabarwati, Shri Mohit Sabarwal, Smt. Prabha Sabarwal, Sri Madan Mohan Gulathi, Sri Prem Gulathi, Sri Dinesh Gulathi, Sri Chitranjan Gulathi and Smt. Brahma Devi, under Section 138/139 N.I. Act and 420, IPC. The complaint case was that the complainant is a leasing company having its Head Office at New Delhi and Branch Office at Aligarh. Shri Pradeep Kumar Agarwal is the Special Power of Attorney Holder of the complainant company and this power of attorney has been signed and executed in favour of Shri Pradeep Kumar Agarwal by the Managing Director of the company Shri Puran Chand. Opposite Party No. 1 M/s. Garima Construction Co. is a Private Ltd. company at Aligarh. Accused No. 2 Shri K
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.