SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(All) 2387

TARUN AGARWALA
Ramkali – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Shiv Sagar Singh, for Applicants; Anurag Khanna, S.C., for Opposite Parties.

ORDER :- Heard Sri Shiv Sagar Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Anurag Khanna, the learned counsel for respondent No. 2.

2. Since a pure question of law is involved, the writ petition is being disposed of at the admission stage itself without calling for a counter-affidavit.

3. The land of the husband of petitioner No. 1 and father of petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 was acquired under the Land Acquisition Act for New Okhla Industrial Development Authority, commonly known as NOIDA. Against an offer made by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, the claimant filed a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act and an award was given by the District Judge, against which, NOIDA filed a First Appeal before this Honble Court in which an interim order for the payment of the compensation to the heirs of the claimant, was passed. Against the said award, the petitioners also filed a First Appeal for the enhancement of the compensation. Prior to the award given by the District Judge, the husband of petitioner No. 1 and father of petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 died and therefore, the first appeal was filed by the present petitioners before the High Court. During the pendency of th

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top