TARUN AGARWALA
Suresh – Appellant
Versus
Chand – Respondent
2. The trial Court framed issue No.2 with regard to the sufficiency of the court fee. The trial Court, by an order dated 28-5-2004, found that the petitioners had valued the plaint at Rs.1.00 lac, whereas, the valuation of the property, as per the sale deed, was Rs.5,20,000=00. The trial Court, also found, that the court fee was required to be paid in accordance with the provisions of Section 7(iv-A) of the Court Fees Act, 1870 as applicable in the State of U.P. The trial Court accordingly directed the plaintiff to file an appropriate amendment application for the amendment of its plaint. The plaintiffs, being aggrieved
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.