2007 Supreme(All) 2654
V. M. SAHAI AND R. N. MISRA, JJ.
Virendra Giri
Versus
State of U.P. and Ors.
C.M.W.P. No. 52171 of 2007
Decided On : 25-10-2007.
I. P. Singh for Petitioner; Vishnu Pratap, S. C. for Respondents.
Purchasers of mine products are not obliged to pay royalty, and the notice for payment of royalty against the provisions of the law was invalid.
Headnote:
Royalty - Mining Lease - Mines and Mineral (Regulation and Development) Act 1957, U.P. Minor Minerals (Concessions) Rules, 1963 - Section 9, Rule 21
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a registered contractor, was given a work order to supply stone boulders to the irrigation department. The petitioner purchased the boulders from a supplier in Rajasthan and submitted bills for payment. The respondents demanded royalty from the petitioner, leading to the filing of the writ petition.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner, as a purchaser of stones from a lease holder of mines, was not obliged to pay royalty. The court directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's case in view of the bills and Rawannas submitted and make the payment without delay.
Issues: Liability to pay royalty on stones taken out from the mines, obligation of the purchaser of mine products to pay royalty, and the respondent's right to withhold payment.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the purchaser of mine products is not obliged to pay royalty, and the notice given by the respondent for payment of royalty was against the provisions of the law.
Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of with the direction to the respondent to consider the petitioner's case in view of the bills and Rawannas and make the payment without delay. The petitioner was not obliged to pay royalty on the stone boulders supplied to the respondent.
2. We have heard Sri I. P. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Vishnu Pratap, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents.
3. From the writ petition, it appears that the petitioner is a registered Contractor in District Budaun. The Executive Engineer (Flood Division), Budaun made an advertisement for construction of work known as "Ganga Mahawa Tatband" in Budaun Division. In response to said advertisement, the petitioner also filed tender, which was accepted. The work order was issued to the petitioner to supply Stone Boulders to Irrigation Department. He purchased the boulders from Rajasthan through M/s Pachauri Stone Supplier, Tatpur, Agra. When he submitted bills for payment, a notice was given to him to pay royalty, though he had already filed Rawannas along with bills. Since the petitioner was not a license holder of mining, therefore, he was not obliged to pay royalty and respondents had no right to with hold his payment for the work done by him. Aggrieved by the order and notice referred to above, the petitioner filed this petition.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents opposed the relief sought for by the petitioner.
5. This fact is not disputed that the petitioner being registered contractor was given work order by respondent No. 3 for supply of stone boulders to irrigation department for construction of "Ganga Mahawa Tatband" and he supplied same in accordance with the terms and conditions of the work order. This fact is also not disputed that the petitioner has completed the work and submitted bills to the irrigation department but his payment has not been made so far. A very substantial question of law has been raised by the petitioner in this writ petition regarding liability to pay royalty on the stones taken out from the mines. Section 9 of Mines and Mineral (Regulation and Development) Act 1957 lays down provisions for payment of royalty. For ready reference, Section 9 is quoted below :-
Section 9 :- Royalties in respect of mining lease - (1) The holder of a mining lease granted before the commencement of this Act shall, notwithstanding anything contained in the instrument of lease or in any law in force at such commencement, pay royalty in respect of (any mineral removed by or consumed by him or by his agent, manager employee, contractor or sub-lease from the leased area after such commencement, at the rate for the time being specified in the Second Schedule in respect of that mineral.
(2) The holder of a mining lease granted on or after commencement of this Act shall pay royalty in respect of (any mineral removed by or consumed by him or by his agent, manager, employee, contractor or sub-lessee) from the leased area the rate for the time being specified in the second schedule in respect of that mineral.
(2A). The holder of a mining lease, whether granted before or after the commencement of the Mines and Minerals ( Regulations and Development) Amendment Act, 1972 shall not be liable to pay any royalty in respect of any coal consumed by a workman engaged in a colliery provided that such consumption by the workman does not exceed one third of a ton per month).
(3) The Central Government may, by notification in Official Gazette amend the Second Schedule so as to enhance or reduce the rate at which royalty shall be payable in respect of any mineral with effect from such date as may be specified in the notification
Provided that the Central Government shall not