SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 2654

V.M.SAHAI, R.N.MISRA
Virendra Giri – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
I. P. Singh for Petitioner; Vishnu Pratap, S. C. for Respondents.

ORDER :- This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner against the respondents for issuing a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 25-8-2007, passed by respondent No. 3 which is filed as Annexure-3 to the writ petition, by which the respondents have demanded royalty from the petitioner for the supply of stones and similar relief in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to withhold payment of the petitioner in pursuance of letter dated 25-8-2007, issued by respondent No. 3.

2. We have heard Sri I. P. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Vishnu Pratap, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents.

3. From the writ petition, it appears that the petitioner is a registered Contractor in District Budaun. The Executive Engineer (Flood Division), Budaun made an advertisement for construction of work known as "Ganga Mahawa Tatband" in Budaun Division. In response to said advertisement, the petitioner also filed tender, which was accepted. The work order was issued to the petitioner to supply Stone Boulders to Irrigation Department. He purchased the boulders from Rajasthan through M/s Pachauri Stone Supp
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top