SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(All) 754

S.K.SINGH, PANKAJ MITHAL
Ashutosh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Anjali Srivastava – Respondent


Advocates appeared
Renu Rajat and Siddharth Srivastava, for Appellant.

JUDGMENT:-

This is husbands appeal.

He had initiated proceedings under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for divorce. In the said proceedings issues were framed and the issue No.3 happened to be with regard to jurisdiction of the Family Court, Allahabad. This issue has been decided as a preliminary issue vide impugned judgment and order dated 19-11-2008 and it has been held that the Court at Allahabad has no jurisdiction and therefore plaint be returned for presentation to proper court of jurisdiction.

2. The appeal was presented before the Registrar General on 18-2-2009 whereupon the office reported it to be beyond limitation by 53 days as under Section 19 of the Family Court Act, 1984 the limitation provided for presenting the appeal is 30 days only. Against this report the appellant has preferred objections contending that basically the appeal is under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act wherein the limitation provided is 90 days and therefore the appeal is within time and the report submitted by the Stamp Reporter treating the appeal to be under Family Court Act, 1984 is incorrect.

3. We have heard Sri Siddhartha Srivastava in support of the above objections. His submissi












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top