SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(All) 494

VINOD PRASAD
Ramji Shukla – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared
Beni Madhav Pandey, K.K. Mishra for Applicant: A.G.A.. For Opp. Parties.

ORDER :-

Held learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A.

2. The applicant complainant Ramji Shukla has approached this Court with the prayer to quash the impugned order dated 3-10-2008 passed by C.J.M., Allahabad in complaint case No. 23676/2008 (Ramji v. Sonu Agrawal), under Sections 279, 304-A, 427 I.P.C., P.S. Naini, District Allahabad.

3. A perusal of the complaint instituted by the applicant, vide annexure No. 1 to this application, before C.J.M., Allahabad, registered as complaint case No. 23676/2008 (Ramji v. Sonu Agrawal), indicates that the allegations levelled were that of causing murder of son of applicant Shivanshu aged about 16 years by crushing him under vehicle No. UP 70 AV 2700.

4. It transpires that when the complaint was filed on 14-8-2008, C.J.M., Allahabad was apprise of the fact that in respect of the said incident, a FIR vide crime No. 371 of 2008, under sections 279, 304 A, 427 I.P.C. was already registered which is pending investigation. C.J.M., Allahabad, therefore, stopped the proceedings of the complaint case and called for a report from the police who reported that crime was investigated and a charge-sheet had, already been submitted against










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top