SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(All) 124

DILIP GUPTA
BHOLA RAM MAURYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
C.K. Rai, Addl. C.S.C. for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Honble Dilip Gupta, J.—The petitioner was appointed as an Assistant Teacher in Government Ashram type school in the year 1969 and was subsequently promoted in JTC/CT grade with effect from 3rd February, 1972. Disciplinary proceedings were initiated against the petitioner who was also suspended by the order dated 20th April, 1985. The petitioner challenged this suspension order before the U.P. Public Services Tribunal by filing Claim Petition No. 560 of 1985. By the order dated 30th May, 1994 the Claim Petition was allowed and the suspension order dated 20th April, 1985 was set aside. It was further ordered that the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner may continue and should be completed expeditiously in accordance with law.

2. The petitioner had been served with a charge sheet dated 16th January, 1986. The inquiry was completed by the District Harijan Social Welfare Officer, who submitted the report dated 18th September, 1986. It, however, transpires that when the inquiry report was placed before the Director, Social Welfare, Uttar Pradesh, he ordered that the inquiry be conducted by the Deputy Director, Social Welfare, Varanasi Region, Varanasi. The s











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top