SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(All) 47

AMAR SARAN
DHARAM PAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
S.K. Dubey for the Applicants; A.G.A. for the Opp. Parties.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Amar Saran, J.—I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

2. In this case, initially the FIR was lodged as a non-cognizable report (NCR) at police station Phoolpur, District Allahabad under Sections 323 and 504 IPC on 8.7.1999 at 5 pm about an incident dated 8.7.1999. The allegations in the NCR lodged by Jagannath were that as the cattle of the accused had entered his field, when his wife and son tried to drive the animals out of the field, there was an exchange of hot words with the applicants who beat Devkali and Kamlesh with lathies and dandas, and caused injuries on the head of Devkali and arms and fingers of Kamlesh. Subsequently, it appears that on the basis of the medical report the case was converted to one under Sections 323, 324 and 325, IPC by the investigating officer and subsequently he even added Section 308, IPC when he submitted the charge-sheet on 12.10.1999.

3. The main contention of the learned counsel for the applicants was that the investigation by the investigating officer was unauthorized as it was a non-cognizable case and in view of Section 155(2), Cr.P.C. the investigation could not have been initiated in the case wi



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top