SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(All) 471

YATINDRA SINGH, R.K.RASTOGI
ARUN KUMAR TIWARI – Appellant
Versus
DEEPA SHARMA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Hon’ble R.K. Rastogi, J.—This is an appeal against the order dated 24.11.2004 passed by Sri M.A. Abbasi, then learned Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Allahabad in original suit No. 415 of 2003, Smt. Deepa Sharma and others v. Smt. Raj Kumari Devi and others.

2. The facts giving rise to this appeal are that the plaintiff-respondents No. 1 to 5 filed original suit No. 415 of 2003 in the Court of the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Allahabad against the defendants No. 1 to 4 (respondents No. 6 to 9) and defendant No. 5 (appellant in the present appeal) with these allegations that about 32 years ago, two rooms on the first floor of house No. 296 (new number 383/96) situate at mohalla Mumfordganj, Allahabad, specified at the foot of the plaint, were let out to Basudeo Sharma, husband of the plaintiff No. 1, father of plaintiffs No. 2 to 4, and father-in-law of plaintiff No. 5, by late Rajendra Singh who was husband of defendant No. 1, father of the defendants No. 2 and 3 and uncle of defendant No. 4. The rent was Rs. 60/- per month. Rajendra Singh was exclusive owner of the house. He executed a registered will on 29.4.1986 in favour of defendants No. 1 to 4. He thereby































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top