SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(All) 375

A.P.SAHI
NIRMALA DWIVEDI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Hon’ble A.P. Sahi, J.—The petitioner in this writ petition has challenged the select list prepared by the Respondent No.2 - the District Basic Education Officer, Chitrakoot, declaring the Respondent No. 5 to have been selected for being appointed as “Shiksha Mitra” under the Government Order dated 26.5.1999 read with the Government Orders dated 1.7.2000 and 10.10.2005 respectively. The petitioner contends that the said action of the authority is in violation of the selections made by the Gram Shiksha Samiti - Respondent No. 4 of Gram Sabha Ailaha Budhaiya, Post Office Manikpur, district - Chitrakoot, and is, therefore, in violation of the Government Orders referred to herein above. On merits, the petitioner contends that her average marks are 63.5% whereas that of Respondent No. 5 is 47% and, as such, the petitioner being higher in merit was entitled to be appointed as per the resolution of the Gram Shiksha Samiti. It is further alleged that the petitioner has also functioned as an Instructor under the non-formal education scheme and, as such, she is also entitled for being appointed on the basis of first preference as per the Government Order dated 10.10.2005. In view of t



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top