S.U.KHAN
JINENDRA KUMAR JAIN – Appellant
Versus
ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, ROORKEE, HARIDWAR – Respondent
Hon’ble S.U. Khan, J.—This is landlord’s writ petition arising out of eviction/ release proceedings initiated by him on the ground of bona fide need under Section 21 of U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972. Some of the contesting respondents were tenants opposite parties before the trial Court and rest were substituted before the Courts below after the death of their predecessor tenants opposite parties. Release application was registered as P.A. Case No. 49 of 1992 on the file of prescribed authority/1st Additional Civil Judge, Muzaffar Nagar. In the release application, respondents 6 and 7 Mitra Sen and Desh Raj were impleaded as alleged sub-tenants. Sri Mitra Sen died and was substituted by his legal representatives. Release application was allowed on 11.11.1994.
2. Accommodation in dispute is commercial in nature rent of which is quite nominal, virtually negligible.
3. Against judgment and order dated 11.11.1994 two appeals were filed one by Dr. Ved Bhushan and others being R.C. Appeal No. 60 of 1994 and the other by Mitrasen being R.C. Appeal No. 62 of 1994. In the appeals on 18.9.1995, which was a date fixed in the appeals one advocate Sri Man Mohan Mittal filed a compromise along
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.