S.U.KHAN
SATYA VRAT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
Hon’ble S.U. Khan, J.—Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.P. Misra, learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 to 4.
2. On 6.7.2006 it had been indicated in the order sheet that as pure question of law regarding interpretation and application of Full Bench authority of this Court reported in Ram Kumar v. State of U.P., 2005 (99) R.D. 823, was involved, hence no counter affidavit was required.
3. The matter pertains to grant of 10 years lease for fishing rights in respect of pond comprised in plot No. 419 area 1.335 hectares situate in village Dandopur Tahsil Padrauna district Kushi Nagar. Petitioner was granted 10 years lease for fishing rights in respect of the pond in dispute as he was the highest bidder in the auction held on 23.1.2006. Petitioner’s bid was for Rs. Two lacs for ten years. Petitioner also deposited 1/4th of the said amount i.e. Rs. 50,000/-. It has also been stated that no person belonging to fishermen’s community or scheduled caste/scheduled tribes participated in the auction proceedings. Deputy Collector Padrauna through order dated 2.3.2006 set aside the auction on the ground that it was hit by the aforesaid Full Bench authority. It was al
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.