SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(All) 976

PRADEEP KANT, RAJIV SHARMA
SHARAD KUMAR VERMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
O.P. Srivastava for the Appellant; Sanjay Bhasin and G.S. Khare for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court—Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri O.P. Srivastava, and Sri G.S. Khare, learned counsel for the State.

2. The petitioner, Sharad Kumar Verma, was selected through the Combined Provincial Services Examination conducted by the U.P. Public Service Commission, Allahabad on the post of Accounts Officer/Treasury Officer. He joined his services at Varanasi on 24.4.1990 and since the year 1991 the petitioner was given charge of Accounts Officer, Basic Shiksha Parishad, Banda. The petitioner continued to discharge his duties on different posts and was handed over four additional charges during the period 1995 to 1998.

3. On 22.8.1998 while the petitioner was working in District Rural Development Agency (DRDA), Jaunpur as Finance and Accounts Officer, disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him. The petitioner was served with a charge-sheet on 27.8.1998. He made a representation requesting for supply of certain documents on 12.10.1998 and since the copies were not supplied he made various representations right from 26.10.1998 upto March, 2000.

4. The petitioner though submitted reply to the charge sheet on 12.10.1998 in which he explained the charges















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top