SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(All) 2129

A.P.SAHI
RAM BILAS YADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Manu Saxena for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble A.P. Sahi, J.—These writ petitions raise common questions relating to the transfer of police personnel from civil police to armed police and their repatriation. The controversy centers around Regulation 525 of the U.P. Police Regulations which is quoted hereinbelow :

“Constable of less than two years’ service may be transferred by the Superintendent of Police from the armed to the civil police or viceversa. Foot police constable may be transferred to the mounted police at their own request. Any civil police constable of more than two and less than ten years’ service may be transferred to the armed police and viceversa by the Superintendent for a period not exceeding six months in any one year. All armed police constables of over two years’ service and civil police constables of over two and under ten years’ service may be transferred to the other branch of the force for any period with the permission of the Deputy Inspector General.

In all other cases the transfer of police officers from one branch of the force to another or from police service of other Provinces to the Uttar Pradesh Police requires the sanction of the Inspector General.”

2. The power of transfer is co








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top