SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(All) 2681

BHARATI SAPRU
SHIV SHANKAR AWASTHI – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTOR SERICULTURE LUCKNOW – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Manish Kumar Nigam for the Petitioner; V.C. Tripathi, S.C. for the Respondents.

JDUGMENT

Hon’ble Bharati Sapru, J.—Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner Sri Manish Kumar Nigam and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents No. 1 and 2.

2. The petitioner has filed present writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 24.5.2002, which is the appellate order by which the petitioner has been removed from service and the order dated 22.9.2001 passed by the respondent No. 2 which is the order passed by the disciplinary authority terminating the services of the petitioner.

3. The facts of the case are that the petitioner was working in the Department of Sericulture as a Demonstrator. The petitioner was posted at Kanpur Nagar and he was transferred to Bahraich on 22.1.1999.

4. Since the petitioner did not comply with the order of transfer, he was served with the order of suspension on 22.3.2000. The petitioner submitted a reply against the order of suspension and prayed for recalling of the same on 25.3.2000.

5. The order of suspension was not recalled and the charge-sheet was issued to the petitioner on 18.8.2000 in which he was charged with being guilty of indiscipline for not complying with the transfer order. The petitioner replied to the













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top