Hon’ble S.N. Srivastava, J.—This writ petition is directed against the impugned order dated 27.1.2006 passed by Deputy Director of Consolidation, Bulandshahar-Opp. party No. 1.

2. It may be prefaced here that initially it was noticed in the case that the Vakalatnama filed by the petitioner did not contain requisite details as per Rules of the Court. The learned Counsel was called upon on 28.2.2006 to remove the defects. The defects have since been removed. The order on that aspect has been passed separately today.

3. It would appear from the record that petitioner was proposed Chak at two places by Assistant Consolidation Officer. On objection filed by petitioner, Consolidation Officer allotted one Chak on petitioner’s original holding, i.e., Plot No. 387/1. This order was affirmed by Settlement Officer, Consolidation, but Deputy Director of Consolidation reversed the order and allotted petitioner’s Chak on different plots excluding his original Plot No. 387/1. This also resulted in reduction of the area of petitioner.

4. Heard learned Counsel for petitioner and learned Counsel for Caveator-Opp. parties.

5. Learned Counsel for petitioner urged that petitioner may be allotte