SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(All) 1124

VINOD PRASAD
RAVINDRA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
K.K. Tripathi for the Applicant; A.G.A., for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Vinod Prasad, J.—An application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. was filed by the present applicant Ravindra Singh against the respondents accused Manoj Singh son of Raja Singh in the Court of A.C.M.M.II, Kanpur Nagar being miscellaneous application No. 61/2006. The offences alleged in the aforesaid application were under Section 498A, 323, 504, 506, 406 I.P.C. The said application has been rejected by the Magistrate and this application to quash the said order of rejection dated 15.2.06.

2. The encapsulated facts were that the daughter of the applicants, namely, Garima was married with the accused Manoj Singh son of Raja Singh on 8.6.05. After the said marriage, the accused namely Manoj Singh, Raja Singh, Neha and Chandan Singh started demanding Rs. 75,000/- more as dowry. As the applicant was unable to satisfy the said dowry demand, His daughter, namely, Garima was subjected to torture and cruelty at the hands of the accused persons. Many endeavour by the applicant were made but all of them failed and the torture continued. On 16.1.06 at 4.00 P.M. the aforesaid named accused persons assaulted Garima severely with dandas. On hue and cry been raised by Gar







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top