SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(All) 1272

[2006(9) ADJ 520 (All)]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : SUNIL AMBWANI, J.
IN THE MATTER OF GOODS OF LATE CAPTAIN JAGDISH CHANDRA VARSHNEY SHRI VARSHNEY SABHA PRAYAG .Plaintiff/Petitioner
Versus
Smt. MUNNI VARSHNEY AND ANOTHER —Respondents
(Testamentary Suit No. 2 of 2003, decided on 28th April, 2006)

Advocates appeared:
A.N. Bhargava and V.P. Varshney for the Petitioner; Navin Sinha and Archana Varshney for the Respondents.

Headnote:Will—Letters of Administration—Cannot be granted of estate of deceased to a registered Society, registered under Societies Registration Act, 1860, i.e., plaintiff-petitioner, under Section 236 of Indian Succession Act, 1925, with Will attached to administer properties of deceased—Therefore, petition not maintainable by Society for grant of Letters of Administration—Legal bar created under Section 236 of Succession Act, 1925, did not allow Court to proceed to consider validity of Will, and to decide other issues—Therefore, preliminary issue was decided against plaintiff-petitioner—And suit was liable to be dismissed with observation that Court has not considered validity of due execution of unregistered Will. [Indian Succession Act, 1925—Sections 236, 57 to 190, 372 to 390, 217, 219, 220, 227 and 232—Civil Procedure Code, 1908—Order VI, Rule 17 and Section 151—Societies Registration Act, 1860—Sections 20 and 7]. [Paras 22, 23 and 24]

       

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Sunil Ambwani, J.—With consent of parties, the following issues were framed as preliminary issue to be decided before framing further issues;

“Whether in view of Section 236 of the Indian Succession Act 1925, ‘Letters of Administration’ can he granted of the estate of the deceased to a registered society.”

2. Heard Shri Virendra Pal Varshney, learned counsel for the plaintiff and Shri Navin Sinha, Senior Advocate for Archana Varshney, heir and legal representative of Smt. Muni Varshney-caveator and the widow of Cap. Jagdish Chandra Varshney, the deceased-testator, whose will dated 26.9.1999 is sought to be administered by the plaintiff.

3. Brief facts giving rise to the suit as stated in the pleadings are that Captain Jagdish Chandra Varshney (the deceased), son of late Shri Tej Pal Varshney, resident of 44/41 Dilkusha Naya Katra, Lajpatra Rai Marg, Allahabad died on 21.12.1998 leaving behind his widow Smt. Munni Varshney and caveator Sri Gyanendra Kumar. The deceased did not leave behind him any children. Shri Varshney Sabha Prayag, registration No. 1025/1990 through its Secretary Krishna Murari Lal Gupta, son of late Madan Mohan Lal Gupta, R/o 1/10, B.K. Banerjee Marg, Naya Katra, Allahabad filed the Testamentary Case No. 17 of 1998, which has been converted into Testamentary Suit No. 2 of 2003 for grant of probate of the will dated 11.10.1998 executed by the deceased by which he has bequeathed his self acquired house No. 44 Dilkusha Naya Katra, Allahabad, for the office and dharmshala of Varshney Sabha, Prayag. The will states that deceased retired as Deputy Labour Commissioner in 1987. He has given half of his service dues to his wife to Smt. Munni and the remaining to his nephew Gyanendra Kumar. He had married Smt. Shanti Devi. He did not have any issue from her and divorced her. He entered into second marriage with Smt. Munni but he did not have any children from her, as well. The will states that Smt. Munni did not treat him well and that he was suffering from several deceases. She had kept her sister’s grand-daughter Archana with her without executing the adoption deed or any document. Archana also was not treating him well and had married a boy against his wishes causing loss to his reputation. The deceased has in the will allowed Smt. Munni, who retired from Education Department the use of all his movable and immovable properties including cash; jewellery; Maruti car; Priya Scooter and households articles detailed in the will. The deceased expressed his happiness over the attitude of his nephew Gyanendra Kumar and his wife Smt Shashi Bala and allowed him to be owner of the investments made by the deceased jointly with him. It is further stated in the will that the deceased was Zonal President of Vishwa Hindu Parishad and thereafter Vice President of Bhartiya Janata Party. He was elected as President of Varshney Sabha Prayag continuously for four years and was actively engaged in the activities of Varshney Sabha which has no office or building of its own and thus he desires to bequeath all his properties except those which he had given to Smt. Munni to Varshney Sabha Prayag. The will was witnessed by Shri Jagdish Chandra Dixit and Shri Aditya Narayan Singh.

4. The plaint encloses death certificate of the deceased; an affidavit of Shri Jagdish Chandra Dixit, the attesting witnesses and schedule of properties with its valuation.

5. A caveat application was filed by late Smt. Munni Varshney through Shri Navin Sinha and Shri Vipin Sinha, Advocate. In her counter affidavit filed on 27.9.1999, she has stated that the deceased had along with her adopted Archana Varshney, who is now aged about 26 years. He was brought up and educated by the deceased. He did1 not execute any will. The alleged document is forged and fabricated, set up by Gyanendra Kumar in collusion with attesting witnesses. The will does not bear the signature of late Shri Jagdish Chandra Varshney. They were married in 19

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top