By the Court—This appeal under the Rules of the Court is preferred against the judgment dated 27.7.2000 passed by the learned Single Judge in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 32263 of 2000.

2. We have heard Shri Abhinav Upadhyaya, learned Standing Counsel for the appellant and Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, learned Counsel for the petitioner-respondent.

3. It appears that the petitioner-respondent applied for admission as Scheduled caste candidate in special B.T.C. training Course pursuant to the advertisement dated 8-3-1998. However, he was not shown in the list of selected candidates and on enquiry he was informed by the appellant that his quality point marks were less than the last selected candidate and therefore he could not be selected and on further enquiry he was Informed that since mark sheet and certificate in support of Caste was not annexed by the petitioner-respondent, therefore he could not be selected. He approached this Court in Writ Petition No. 24309 of 1999 which was finally disposed of by this Court vide judgment dated 9.12.1999 alongwith large number of other petitions involving similar disputes wherein this Court placed the case of the petitioner-respondent in c