Hon’ble Krishna Murari, J.—Heard Sri M.A. Khan, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

2. Challenge in this petition has been made to the order dated 22.9.2006 passed by the Consolidation Commissioner rejecting the representation moved by the petitioners for cancellation of the consolidation proceedings.

3. The facts are that a notification under Section 4 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act (for short the ‘Act’) with regard to village in question, was published in official Gazette on 3.5.2001. An application dated 9.6.2001 was moved by the petitioners before the District Deputy Director of Consolidation for cancellation of the same on the ground that most of the tenure holders are satisfied and do not want fresh consolidation. A resolution dated 12.1.2005 to the same effect alleged to have been passed by Gaon Sabha was also filed. However, when no action was taken on the said application, the petitioner approached this Court by means of writ petition No. 28565 of 2006 which was disposed of vide order dated 24.5.2006 directing that petitioners may approach Director of Consolidation by moving appropriate application who shal