VINOD PRASAD
RAM AVTAR GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
Honble Vinod Prasad, J.—The revisionist was tried by C.J.M. Rampur in Crl. Appeal No. 05 of 2006, Ram Avtar v. Preetam Singh and another, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1981, P.S. Civil Lines, District Rampur.
2. The complaint-allegations against the revisionist as were levelled by Preetam Singh Badhwa were that the revisionist had taken a loan of a total amount of Rs. 2,80,000/- from the complainant on various dates 22-11-1999, 26-11-1999 and 30-11-2000. On the demand being made for return of the said loan amount, the accused issued an account payee cheque No. 090667 dated 5-2-2002 of Punjab and Sindh Bank, Bheet, Rampur on 1-3-2002 at 9.00 a.m. at the house of the complainant of an amount of Rs. 1,80,000/- which was deposited on the same day by the complainant in his account in the same Bank for encashment. However, the said cheque was dishonoured by the bank on 5-3-2002 because it exceed arrangement. Since the cheque amount remained unpaid, a notice as is contemplated under Section 138 of the N.I. Act was sent by the complainant to the revisionist on 15-3-2002. The complainant also sent another notice on 18-3-2002 to the revisionist through registere
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.