SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 309

R.K.AGRAWAL, PANKAJ MITHAL
RAM KALI – Appellant
Versus
LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION, ALLAHABAD – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
R.G. Padia for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Pankaj Mithal, J.—The husband of the petitioner had taken an Insurance Policy No. 311438746 in his name for an assured sum of Rs. 40,000/- and was paying half yearly installments. The husband of the petitioner expired on 27.3.2005. Therefore, she made a claim under the policy. The Senior Divisional Manager, Life Insurance Corporation (hereinafter referred to as LIC) vide order dated 31.3.2006 rejected the claim of the petitioner on the ground that the above policy had lapsed for non-payment of premium and was revived w.e.f. 15.10.2004 on the strength of the statement of the insured dated 9.10.2004 which was subsequently found to be false. The said rejection order has been challenged by the petitioner with the prayer that she may be given the claim under the above policy.

2. Sri R.G. Padia has filed counter affidavit on behalf of the respondent LIC to which rejoinder affidavit has also been filed.

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties who agree for final disposal of the writ petition at this stage itself on the basis of the above affidavits.

4. Admittedly, the policy had been revived and it was continuing. A perusal of the statement of the insured on the basis of






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top