SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 26

S.RAFAT ALAM, SUDHIR AGARWAL
CHHATRA DHARI PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
ANIL KUMAR GAUTAM – Respondent


JUDGMENT

By the Court.—Heard learned Counsel for the appellant.

2. We are of the view that this appeal under Chapter VIII Rule 5 of the Rules of the Court is not maintainable since the order, which has been impugned in the appeal, is not a judgment as by the said order the Hon’ble Single Judge has simply granted an interim order after being satisfied that a prima facie case is made out for granting the interim relief.

3. Learned Counsel for the appellant however sought to argue that his caveat was there and, therefore, in view of the judgment in the case of Committee of Management, Janta Inter College, Bhopa, District Muzaffarnagar v. Deputy Director of Education, I Region Meerut and others, 1996 (1) UPLBEC 313, the appeal is maintainable. However, we do not find any substance in the submission for the reason that under Chapter VIII Rule 5 of the Rules of the Court, the appeal lies only against a judgment and not otherwise. In Committee of Management, Janta Inter College, Bhopa, District Muzaffarnagar v. Deputy Director of Education (supra), the Court found the appeal maintainable for the reason that besides suspending the operation of the order impugned in the writ petition, the sing





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top