S.RAFAT ALAM, SUDHIR AGARWAL
CHHATRA DHARI PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
ANIL KUMAR GAUTAM – Respondent
By the Court.—Heard learned Counsel for the appellant.
2. We are of the view that this appeal under Chapter VIII Rule 5 of the Rules of the Court is not maintainable since the order, which has been impugned in the appeal, is not a judgment as by the said order the Hon’ble Single Judge has simply granted an interim order after being satisfied that a prima facie case is made out for granting the interim relief.
3. Learned Counsel for the appellant however sought to argue that his caveat was there and, therefore, in view of the judgment in the case of Committee of Management, Janta Inter College, Bhopa, District Muzaffarnagar v. Deputy Director of Education, I Region Meerut and others, 1996 (1) UPLBEC 313, the appeal is maintainable. However, we do not find any substance in the submission for the reason that under Chapter VIII Rule 5 of the Rules of the Court, the appeal lies only against a judgment and not otherwise. In Committee of Management, Janta Inter College, Bhopa, District Muzaffarnagar v. Deputy Director of Education (supra), the Court found the appeal maintainable for the reason that besides suspending the operation of the order impugned in the writ petition, the sing
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.