SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 723

S.N.SRIVASTAVA
SHESH NATH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
K.N. Mishra for the Petitioner; V.P. Tripathi, V.K. Singh, S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble S.N. Srivastava, J.—By this writ petition order dated 3rd May, 2006, passed by the Additional Commissioner, Gorakhpur Division, Gorakhpur allowing the Appeal of Sadhan Sahkari Samiti Limited, Kauri Ram, District Gorakhpur and by the connected Writ Petition No. 31223 of 2006 the order dated 17.5.2006, passed by the Additional Commissioner, Gorakhpur Division, Gorakhpur allowing the Recall Application setting aside the earlier order passed on Appeal and directing the matter to be heard and decided on merits are impugned.

2. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

3. It was urged by learned Counsel for the petitioner-Shesh Nath in Writ Petition No. 26859 of 2006 that no appeal lies against an order appointing two persons as licensees to distribute essential commodities through fair price shop bifurcating one shop.

4. In this regard Sri V.K. Singh, learned Counsel for Gaon Sabha produced before me a Government Order by which Government Order dated 3rd July, 1990 was made operative.

5. From perusal of Paragraph-11 of the Government Order dated 3rd July, 1990, it is clear that against an order passed by the District Magistrate relating to appointment/suspension/cancellation/re











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top