SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 765

ARUN TANDON
MEHANDI HASAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Honble Arun Tandon, J.—Heard Counsel for the parties.

2. These 12 writ petitions, which have been filed by rival parties claiming a right to manage the Local Committee of All India Muslim Educational Conference, Bareilly, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act as well as Fazlur Rahman Islamia Inter College, Bareilly along with other educational institutions established and managed by the said society.

3. At the very outset the Court may record its unhappiness about the manner in which the parties have mis-utilized/rather abused the process of writ proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for perpetuating their continuance in the institution for years together without the actual dispute of right to manage the society and the institution as lawfully elected office bearers being finally adjudicated at any point of time by any of the authorities, as well as without getting any writ petition finally decided. By complicating facts and by concealing the real issue parties have been successful in obtaining interim orders after interim orders from this Court and as a result whereof at no point of time the basic issue of the right to be the lawful o






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top