SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 666

IMTIYAZ MURTAZA, A.K.ROOPANWAL
NAUSHAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Pankaj Bharti for the Appellant; A.G.A. for the Opposite Party.

JUDGMENT

Honble Imtiyaz Murtaza, J.—This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 5-10-2005 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C. 1 Muzaffarnagar in S.T. No. 377 of 2004 whereby the appellant is convicted under Section 376, I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 10,000/- and in case of default in payment of fine, further imprisonment for one year.

2. The brief facts of the case mentioned in the report lodged by Muzaffar Ali at P.S. Kotwali Nagar Muzaffarnagar are that informant’s daughter Shabana who was aged about 16 years and she was a minor and was under his guardianship. She was of a low intelligence and Irshad was his maternal uncle. Naushad is son of Irshad and Shehnaz is wife of Irshad, being relative they used to visit each other house. Naushad was very clever. He has enticed his daughter Shabana and cheated her on the pretext that he will marry her and committed sexual intercourse with her. His daughter became pregnant and about 10 days back Shabana had narrated to her mother as to how she was raped by Naushad. He and his wife had talked with Irshad and his wife and told them that his son has committed rape against her will

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top