SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 811

VINOD PRASAD
LATOORI SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Allowed.
Advocates appeared:
Raj Singh for the Applicant; A.G.A. for the Opposite Parties.

JUDGMENT

Honble Vinod Prasad, J.—The applicant Latoori Singh who is the informant of Crime No. 184 of 2004 has approached this Court with the prayer that the order dated 5-4-2005 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 9, Aligarh in Case No. 266 of 2005, State v. Bhagat Singh & Ors., be quashed alongwith the order dated 31-10-2005 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 1, Aligarh passed in Criminal Revision No. 313 of 2005, Latoori Singh v. State of U.P. & Ors. By the impugned order, the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate has rejected the prayer of the applicant-informant for summoning the accused under Section 308, I.P.C. The lower Revisional Court by the order dated 31-10-2005, aforesaid, has rejected the revision filed by the applicant-informant. Hence, this application invoking the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482, Cr.P.C. for the relief mentioned above.

2. The factual aspect of the case are that the daughter-in-law of the informant Latoori Singh, namely Smt. Gajno Devi wife of Padam Singh was present in her house when the co-villager accused persons Bhagat Singh, Guddu, Prem Chandra and Smt. Katura, w/o Bhagat Singh, were bloc








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top