SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 941

VINOD PRASAD
ROSHAN LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.S. Upadhyaya and B.S. Shrinet for the Appellant; A.G.A. for the Opposite Party.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Vinod Prasad, J.—Roshan Lal son of Dhaniram resident of Harsh, Police Station Kasuli, district Solan, Himachal Pradesh has filed this appeal challenging his conviction under Section 20 (B) (II) N.D.P.S. Act, and sentence of ten years R.I. with fine of Rs. On lac recorded by Special Judge, N.D.P.S. Act, Allahabad in Special Sessions Trial Number 24 of 1995, State v. Roshan Lal, under Section 20(B) (ll) N.D.P.S. Act, Police Station George Town, District Allahabad (arising out of Crime Number 22 of 1995). The Trial Judge has also ordered that the appellant shall undergo two years simple imprisonment in the event of default in payment of fine awarded to him and the sentence spent in jail by the appellant shall be reconned with as term of his sentence while computing his period of sentence awarded by the impugned judgment.

2. In nutshell the prosecution allegations as is culled out from the recovery memo F.I.R. are that on 16.1.1995 S.I. Doodh Nath Yadav (Informant) S.O. of Police Station George Town, Allahabad accompanied by Constable Jai Narain Singh, Constable Dhirendra Singh, Constable Rajesh Kumar Singh, driver Chandrabali Yadav was searching for the accused of Crime



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top